This past summer, the U.S. Supreme Court, with its Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo decision, put an end to the principle that federal courts should defer to federal regulatory agencies' expertise ...

Rep. Mark Green is a physician and combat veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq and represents the 7th Congressional District of Tennessee. He interviewed Saddam Hussein for six hours on the night of his ...

This article originally appeared in The Maricopa Lawyer. Changes in federal and many states’ laws (e.g., just last month in Arizona) may put industry on more equal footing with agencies when ...

The Supreme Court eliminated so-called “Chevron deference” more than a year ago. Hatched from the 1984 Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council ruling, the doctrine held that courts should defer ...

The endangerment finding was an outgrowth of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 2007 in Massachusetts v. EPA, which held that greenhouse gases are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act. The ...

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters. Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and ...

Doomsayers blasted the Supreme Court last month when it overturned “Chevron deference,” a doctrine that gave federal agencies wide latitude to create and enforce regulations. Critics have claimed the ...

Courts no longer have to defer to an agency’s interpretation of the law simply because the law is ambiguous. The ruling aligns Puerto Rico with U.S. Supreme Court decisions, marking a shift from blind ...