Without more, we are as yet unprepared to join those who believe that the overruling of "Chevron" in and of itself will result in the disassembly of modern administrative regulatory programs. In Loper ...
On the surface, a dispute over whether small fishing businesses should be required to pay for onboard monitors to observe their catch would not appear to be a potential game-changer for administrative ...
Administrative law is the bedrock of the legal environmental world, and under Chevron, courts favor agency interpretations of highly technical statutes. Should the Court overturn or undercut the ...
Randel Johnson, left, of Cornell Law School, and Michael J. Lotito, of Littler, right. Courtesy photos The U.S. Supreme Court recently heard arguments regarding whether it should reverse or modify the ...
WASHINGTON, June 28 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court decided on Friday to overturn a 40-year-old legal doctrine used by the federal government to defend some of its regulatory actions in court. The ...
Jack Fitzhenry is a legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. Follow him on X at @Jfitzy_jd. GianCarlo Canaparo is a legal fellow in the Edwin Meese III ...
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. By overturning Chevron, the Supreme Court has declared war on an administrative state that touches everything ...
Who makes the law in America? If you answered “Congress,” you’d be partly right. Congress makes part of the law in America, but only a very small part. And who interprets the law in America? Again, if ...
In two cases the Supreme Court is considering, herring fishermen in New Jersey and Rhode Island are challenging regulatory fees they say were never authorized by Congress. Critics of those lawsuits ...
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court announced it planned to take up a case challenging a landmark 1984 case affirming vast powers on the part of federal agencies. As explained by Politico, the ...
When the Supreme Court met last week to reconsider judicial deference to agencies’ legal interpretations, the justices grappled with one of the most unsettling qualities of modern government: sweeping ...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court decided on Friday to overturn a 40-year-old legal doctrine used by the federal government to defend some of its regulatory actions in court. The doctrine, ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback