Two words in a Supreme Court opinion handed down last week seem arcane, but may have substantial repercussions for how Congress drafts statutes and how courts interpret them. In Armstrong v.
“Even if the majority is right that Harris and Wilcox were unlawfully removed under current Supreme Court precedent, there is a wholly separate question of whether reinstatement, effectuated by ...
The Trump administration's Department of Justice (DOJ) said in a reply to the Supreme Court Tuesday that the use of the National Guard in Chicago is "not judicially reviewable." "Given that the ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback