De novo judicial review describes a review of a trial court’s decision by a court of appeals and is used in questions of how ...

When President Donald Trump stated that a judicial rollback of his sweeping tariff program would be “1929 all over again, a GREAT DEPRESSION,” he placed a legal ruling at the center of a dramatic ...

Question: Why can one judge stop policy actions by Congress or the president? Answer: Federal judges at any level are very powerful figures whose authority to interpret laws and the U.S. Constitution ...

Firmly established in 1803 with Marbury v. Madison, the idea of judicial review has been essential to preserving American democracy. That landmark Supreme Court decision established the power of the ...

The Trump administration has attempted to make sweeping use of emergency powers in the areas of immigration, trade, and domestic use of the military. In each case, President Donald Trump has tried to ...

The president asserted broad powers to deport people, impose tariffs, and deploy the National Guard based on his own ...

President Trump’s continued defiance of a federal court order, embraced by the U.S. Supreme Court, to “facilitate” the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, in conjunction with the Court’s ruling ...

The judiciary exists to interpret laws and ensure they comply with the Constitution. If the executive branch were to violate the constitutional rights of individuals—for example, by attempting to ...

Speaker Dr Jagath Wickramaratne yesterday (09) delivered a ruling under Standing Order 27(3), declaring out of order a motion ...

Scholars have engaged in a sharp argument over whether the judiciary should follow the original understanding in interpreting the Constitution. Recent criticism has argued that originalism fails ...