1hon MSN
A federal employee who accepted Trump's "fork in the road" buyout said he's worried he won't get paid or be able to find another job.
Federal labor unions didn't have legal standing to sue, a federal judge in Massachusetts said. The administration had been losing a series of claims.
The Trump administration is racing to fix mistakes after some agencies fired probationary employees who had accepted the deferred resignation offer.
A federal judge declined to further pause a federal government buyout program, enabling the government to forge ahead with its “Fork in the Road” program ... The decision allows the Trump administration to close a window to accept the deal that ...
Elon Musk's "Fork in the Road" Federal workers received the Trump administration's offer in an email last month entitled "A Fork in the Road," mirroring the subject line of a 2022 message sent by ...
The program, termed the “Fork in the Road” and promoted by Trump adviser Elon Musk, originally had a deadline of Feb. 6 for workers to accept the offer. Last week, O’Toole temporarily ...
Roughly 75,000 federal workers across government have accepted a buyout offer, taking an unusual deal spearheaded by the Trump administration as it looks to reduce the federal workforce. A senior
USA TODAY on MSN13d
President Trump's buyouts for federal employees can proceed, judge rulesThe Trump administration stopped accepting signups on Wednesday for its "Fork in the Road" buyout offer after a judge lifted his hold on the program.
Judge George O’Toole ruled that the plaintiffs, several labor unions, lacked a “direct stake” in Trump’s directive.
U.S. District Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. dissolved his restraining order blocking the "deferred resignations" program after finding the plaintiffs lacked legal standing.
More than 700 National Park Service employees have submitted resignations as part of Elon Musk’s “fork in the road” offer, according to an internal agency memo.
Several labor unions challenged the deferred resignation plan in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on February 4, arguing that it violated the Administrative Procedure Act. In a decision issued on Wednesday,
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results