De novo judicial review describes a review of a trial court’s decision by a court of appeals and is used in questions of how ...

In a surprising twist, millions may find themselves voiceless in the upcoming local elections, sparking outrage and ...

Making judicial discipline records public was a great victory for transparency — until the General Assembly reversed it.

Supporters of the WASPI campaign (Women Against State Pension Inequality) have been warned that DWP's new compensation ...

Judges need to be well equipped to handle increasingly complex cases relating to economic and regulatory matters ...

The Supreme Court of India has increasingly moved from reviewing the legality of administrative decisions to issuing ...

The DWP's new decision about what recompense the WASPI women should get could be delayed, people are being warned. The WASPI ...

The U.S. Supreme Court decides if laws made in the United States violate the Constitution or not. It’s called judicial review ...

A Clark County jurist needs a law school refresher course on the First Amendment.

President Trump promised to fill the appeals courts with “my judges.” They have formed a nearly united phalanx to defend his ...

The carriers’ cases against the FCC rely on the Supreme Court’s June 2024 ruling in Securities and Exchange Commission v.

A full panel of Ninth Circuit judges overturned Tuesday the court’s decades-long precedent of granting an exception to the federal rule of criminal procedure’s “plain error” review standard when the ...