The Trump administration’s decision to cap how much NIH will pay for indirect costs on university research grants would cost 10 red states more than $1 billion.

The National Institutes of Health announced major reductions to indirect costs for research funding Feb. 7 in a move many experts say would cause serious harm to lifesaving medical ...

Some lawmakers and the Trump administration have criticized the government’s long-standing model for reimbursing universities ...

Student researchers at UCLA are grappling with the next steps in their academic and professional journeys as the threat of ...

Federal rulings pausing NIH grant cuts highlight an unprecedented, adversarial shift in U.S. research funding, leaving academic medicine institutions wary of deeper rifts. In June, federal judges ...

An update on the work to address the financial challenges arising from ongoing shifts in federal regulatory and fiscal policy ...

The National Institutes of Health announced it would cap indirect costs for its grants at 15%, a decline from its previous average for indirect cost rates between 27% and 28%. Monday, July 14 ...

National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya faced critical questions from both Republican and Democratic senators Tuesday as he sought to defend the Trump administration’s sweeping ...

On May 5, Cornell sued the National Science Foundation (NSF) over a 15% cap on recovery of indirect costs associated with its research grants. This follows two earlier lawsuits on the same issue ...

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from making drastic cuts to research funding that is provided by the National Science Foundation.

Emails obtained by The Chronicle offer a rare and revealing look inside a red-state university’s deliberations over a policy change that would mean stark funding reductions.