Some lawmakers and the Trump administration have criticized the government’s long-standing model for reimbursing universities ...

The National Institutes of Health announced major reductions to indirect costs for research funding Feb. 7 in a move many experts say would cause serious harm to lifesaving medical ...

The new model comes as universities brace for a proposed 15-percent limit on indirect costs that would cost them billions of ...

Student researchers at UCLA are grappling with the next steps in their academic and professional journeys as the threat of ...

Reducing the indirect rate to 15% would require the university to absorb $27 million in indirect costs. So far, Gold said, only NIH grants are affected by the new indirect rate ceiling proposed.

An update on the work to address the financial challenges arising from ongoing shifts in federal regulatory and fiscal policy ...

Ten groups representing universities, medical centers, and others have wrapped up an alternative to the Trump administration's plan to cut billions of dollars in research overhead payments.

The portrayal of uncaring scientists without any thought for the animals being used in their research is far from the truth.

NIH says of this funding, approximately $26 billion went to direct costs for research, while $9 billion was allocated to overhead through NIH’s indirect cost rate.

Shifts in U.S. federal science funding—driven by the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—are causing delays, uncertainty, and program changes across academic and regulatory ...